February 26, 2013

Gonzaga by the Numbers: Just how good are we?



The new polls were released yesterday, and with the beat down Miami received last week (losing by 15 points to Wake Forest), predictions came true and the Zags were ranked #2 in the Nation for the first time in school history.  Interestingly, this is also the first time since Memphis in 2008, that a non-power 6 team was ranked in the top 2.

So the next question becomes how high can the Zags go?  Can they be ranked #1?  Perhaps, if Indiana drops a few games of their upcoming schedule- they still face Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio State, and Michigan to close out the regular season.  But have the Zags done enough to earn #1?  That is the argument that the rest of the Nation is considering.  The amount of hateful comments directed to the Zags on ESPN and local papers for being “over-rated” is astounding.  So let’s take a look at the numbers and dissect just how this Gonzaga team compares to the rest of the top 5.  I also added in Florida and Louisville to round out the lower half of the top 10 and to provide comparisons for the SEC and Big East, in addition to the Big Ten, ACC, and Big 12 conferences.

First, the polls:

AP Top 5:
1.     Indiana (24-3)
2.     Gonzaga (27-2)
3.     Duke (24-3)
4.     Michigan (23-4)
5.     Miami (22-4)

Outliers:
8. Florida (22-4)
10. Louisville (22-5)

Coaches Poll:
1.     Indiana
2.     Gonzaga
3.     Duke
4.     Michigan
5.     Kansas (23-4)

Outliers:
6.     Florida
9.   Louisville

Now we will examine each teams Conference, Conference Rank, Non-Conference Strength of Schedule, Overall Strength of Schedule, and Record vs. RPI Top 25.  Teams with the worst rank in each category are highlighted in yellow.  As you can see below, Gonzaga suffers at first glance due to our overall SOS, impacted strongly by our conference schedule in the WCC.  We have also played fewer teams in the RPI Top 25.  Michigan also looks weak with the below numbers when you consider their non-conference strength of schedule at a horrific 162nd in the nation, and they have split their games, going 4-4 vs Top 25 RPI.


School
Conference
ESPN Conf. Rank
ESPN Non Conf. SOS
ESPN Overall SOS
ESPN VS. RPI Top 25
Indiana
Big Ten
1
59
27
7-1
Gonzaga
WCC
10
26
79
2-0
Duke
ACC
4
1
2
5-2
Michigan
Big Ten
1
162
41
4-4
Miami
ACC
4
3
3
5-1
Kansas
Big 12
5
21
14
5-2
Florida
SEC
8
8
22
2-2
Louisville
Big East
2
31
9
2-3

Now, we will take a look at additional advanced statistics, which are becomingly increasingly important to college basketball.  ESPN wrote an article yesterday outlining how the sport has changed and more  coaches are looking at advanced statistics to adjust their game plans and for recruiting purposes.

In this next chart, we will take a look at RPI, BPI, Ken Pomeroy Overall rankings, Adjusted Offensive Efficiency, Adjusted Defensive Efficiency, and the UPS Team Performance Index.

RPI: Ratings Percentage Index.  This measures a teams overall winning %, their opponent’s winning %, and their opponent’s opponent’s winning %.  The majority of this index comes from how your competition fares, so the better they do, the better your win looks, and the better your team’s RPI.

BPI: Basketball Power Index. This is a new index from ESPN that factors in scoring margin, diminishing returns for blowouts, pace of game, Home/Neutral/Road Wins, SOS beyond Opponent’s Opponent’s W-L, All wins are better than losses, and de-weighting games with missing key players.

KenPom: Ken Pomeroy is a statistical GURU.  His measurements take into account a teams offensive and defensive efficiency by weighing points scored and points allowed per possession.  It also factors in winning percentage, tempo, SOS, etc.  For more information, click here.
·      Adjusted Offense - Adjusted offensive efficiency - An estimate of the offensive efficiency (points scored per 100 possessions) a team would have against the average D-I defense.
·      Adjusted Defense - Adjusted defensive efficiency - An estimate of the defensive efficiency (points allowed per 100 possessions) a team would have against the average D-I offense.

UPS Team Performance Index: A Data index that measures offensive and defensive efficiency.  This index is designed to identify well-balanced teams that do multiple things well.  It includes six key stats:
·      Offensive Measure: Effective Field Goal %
·      Defensive Measure: Effective Field Goal % Against
·      Rebounding: Rebounding %
·      Ball Handling: Assists/Game, Steals/Game, Opponent’s Assists/Game, Opponent’s Steals/Games
·      Overall Miscue Measure: “Non-Steal” Turnovers/Game, Fouls/Game, Opponent’s Turnovers/Game, Opponent’s Fouls/Game
·      Success Measure: Winning %
For more information, click here.


School
RPI
BPI
KenPom
Adjusted Offense
Adjusted Defense
UPS Team Performance
Indiana
7
1
2
1
13
1 (130.39)
Gonzaga
10
5
4
4
23
2 (130.08)
Duke
1
3
6
5
22
9 (121.94)
Michigan
6
6
8
2
43
10 (121.78)
Miami
2
14
13
39
6
20 (118.53)
Kansas
4
7
9
22
7
11 (121.73)
Florida
5
2
1
3
2
3 (129.37)
Louisville
8
4
3
20
1
13 (120.51)


As RPI again is really a measurement of your opponents, it is no wonder that Gonzaga has an RPI of 10.  Our Strength of Schedule really prevents this number from getting much better.  However, when you look at KenPom and the UPS rankings, we are a solid team.  We have an extremely high-adjusted offense, and our defense is in the top 25 nationally.  If you look immediately below Gonzaga, you can see that our Offense and Defense compares us very similarly to Duke.  Florida is a dangerous team looking at advanced statistics, as they rank in the top 5 in all categories.  

On a semi-unrelated note: per the above, I think Miami is overrated…which I have been saying for weeks.  They should have dropped much lower than 5th in the rankings after a 15 point blowout to Wake Forest.  Who by the way, is 12-14 overall, and 5-9 in conference, ranked 162nd in the Nation in Field Goal %, 290th in Assists per game, 235th in Rebounds per game, and 174th in points per game.   Prior to that, Miami barely beat Clemson (45-43) and barely beat Virginia (54-50).  They are on a downward trend. 

Also, for all the love that Indiana has been receiving and all the hatred for Gonzaga, one thing to note is that Indiana and Gonzaga share the same losses.  Both teams lost to Illinois and Butler. 

Finally, I will leave you with this little thought from Andy Katz:

• Don't judge Gonzaga on its past. Look at the Zags now since that's all the selection committee will do. The Zags have earned a No. 1 seed to this point.

Andy Katz, I agree.  Gonzaga is playing some tremendous basketball right now.

That’s all folks!

*Source: Statistics compiled from ESPN, Kenpom.com, Stats Hosted Solutions.

7 comments:

kg said...

Great write-up Brianna! Someone definitely needed to sift through all the statistical data and come up with a solid conclusion... I'm just glad it was you instead of me :)

I disagree on a couple points. First, while I think Miami is definitely trending downward, their impressive run in the ACC and blowout wins over great teams deserves some credit. While they might not be a one seed due to their remaining schedule (and a loss or two thrown in there), they are scary to me. They are loaded with upperclassmen, have playmaking guards and a solid post presence.

Also, I've been largely unimpressed with Florida of late. They have a lot of talent but they seem to blowout bad teams (the SEC is incredibly down this year and I think the WCC is at least as strong a conference overall) and struggle against good ones. If Kentucky or Vanderbilt were better this year they'd have a couple more losses, I think. If we end up as a 2-seed I would LOVE to see Florida at the top of our bracket.

Also, I love the Illinois/Butler point... absolutely perfect. There is no better way to judge media bias/overreaction than to look at our shared losses and the way that we are sold as a overachievers while IU are blue-blood elites. While both of Indiana's losses were extremely close and our loss to Illinois was much larger, it's important to note that Illinois was absolutely OUT of their game with IU. The fact that the game was even competitive was a miracle in itself, showing that the vaunted IU defense has some cracks on the outside.

I'm rambling now. TL;DR: Go Zags, run the table and force them to bump you up.

Anonymous said...

Thanks KG. I see your points, but...

I would have said 3 weeks ago that Miami was legit, but they are trending downward at the wrong time. I have to give them credit for their blowouts of both Duke and UNC, both by over 20 points though! That is a feat in itself. I think the March rematch AT Duke, will speak volumes for where Miami is right now and where they will be seeded.

I really like Florida. I completely agree that the SEC is down this year and is on par with the WCC. But, Florida to me is a legit team and I think they could be dangerous in March.

Our loss to Illinois was larger, and that doesn't look great...but we slipped one game, it happens! I am not going count the Butler game, because we should have won and that was a fluke that will hopefully never happen again!

Yes, go Zags!

Matt said...

Some more "by the numbers" comparing these top teams.

Copy and paste into your browser and take a gander...also be sure to look at Offense and Defense comparisons: enjoy!

http://statsheet.com/mcb/teams/compare?t1-season=2012-2013&t1-type=&t1=gonzaga&t2-season=2012-2013&t2-type=&t2=indiana&t3-season=2012-2013&t3-type=&t3=duke&t4-season=2012-2013&t4-type=&t4=florida&t5-season=2012-2013&t5-type=&t5=michigan&t6=miami-fl

Anonymous said...

Wow, that is pretty awesome! Thanks for the info!

Matt said...

No problem! Great job on the article btw!!! I love looking at the science behind the art of GU BB!

I will say my.02 I love GU, obviously, but they are a weak #1 seed IMO but that is more a product of the conference they are in and less about how good they are. They ARE one of the best 3-5 teams this year...but regardless, 1 seed, 2 seed...it really does not matter, they just need to BE who they are come time for the big dance..... This Cinderella (program) is all grown up and ready to "stomp the yard" but will they just turn back into a pumpkin at midnight?

my gut says no...this team plays for the love of the game and for each other...team like that is hard to beat. :)

Go ZAGS!

Anonymous said...

I agree they are a weak 1 seed and completely agree it is because of our conference. This team is special: unselfish and loving every minute they play. I think they will savor every moment and make quite the run in the tourney. They don't play down to competition like teams in the past and I really think they are getting better every game. I'm just excited to watch it all unfold!

Unknown said...

Another excellent write-up Brianna! Thanks for taking the time, and putting in the effort.

Also, on the Indiana vs Zag losses to Illinois and Butler: We should have beaten Butler, we were the better team but gave it away. And, we lost to Illinois when they were smokin hot and ranked very high. They have fallen apart since then (except beating Indy). Indiana just straight up lost to a free falling Illini team that was not even ranked. Now, Indy loses to Minnesota. Obviously there's much more to it but using only comparative loses we look better than Indiana.

Perhaps they need to do something besides lose to unranked teams if they want to make the case that they should remain #1.